Vena Platform
What is Vena Platform?
Cloud-based, flexible CPM platform designed for business users with unified functionality for planning and forecasting, reporting, analytics, financial consolidation and close, and account reconciliation. Tight and strategic integration with Microsoft's technology stack (e.g., Excel, Teams, Power BI and Azure ML).
Self-description of Vena Platform
Would you like to find out more about BARC reviews? Our FAQs answer the most important questions.
Case studies from this vendor
Vena Platform BARC Review & Rating
This section contains our independent analyst views on Vena Platform.
Provider and product description
Founded in 2011, Vena is a cloud platform provider for financial planning and analysis (FP&A), financial close, consolidation, and account reconciliation with more than 700 employees. Headquartered in Toronto, Canada, the vendor has operating entities in the United States, the United Kingdom, and India. Vena is backed by several investors to accelerate growth. According to Vena, it currently has over 2,200 customers worldwide. In February 2026, Vena announced its definitive agreement to acquire Acterys (subject to customary regulatory approval), a Microsoft Power BI-based operational planning and app development platform. Acterys provides finance, business analytics, and IT departments with Microsoft Power BI write-back and Microsoft Fabric-based data analytics to connect financial models and purpose-built operational applications.
Vena is a performance management platform that helps organizations of all sizes and industries with integrated solutions for planning, budgeting, forecasting, reporting, analytics, financial consolidation and close, and account reconciliation. The primary target group for the product is the office of finance and accounting, all operational departments, and also – with Acterys – IT and BI teams. As a cloud-native platform leveraging Microsoft Azure, Vena can be accessed via web browsers and offers native integration with Microsoft Office 365. Vena strategically integrates with Microsoft’s technology stack – leveraging Excel and Power BI (with Acterys) as its primary user interface for entering data, integrating with Microsoft 365 (e.g., PowerPoint, Teams), and embedding and productizing Power BI and Microsoft’s AI and ML technology for FP&A reporting, analysis, and advanced analytics (called Vena Insights). The product is sold and implemented by Vena itself but also through a global partner network of more than 190 resellers and solution implementers. Vena has a strong focus on enhancing its global partner ecosystem, developing new partnerships, and partnering on preconfigured solutions. In addition, and as a strategic future channel for global sales, Vena is part of Microsoft’s co-selling program through the Azure Marketplace. Customers can purchase Vena software licenses through the Azure Marketplace using their Microsoft Azure Consumption Commitment (MACC), providing potential cost benefits.
Vena’s solution is technically based on its own Vena CubeFLEXTM technology – an in-memory, multidimensional database that is the core of the platform – as well as a relational/OLTP database to handle large-scale transaction data volumes (leveraging Microsoft Azure SQL Server as the underlying technology). For data integration, Vena offers its own data transformation layer/ETL and open APIs. In addition, Microsoft Fabric Data Factory can be used for advanced integrations and data processing. Prebuilt connectors are available leveraging Microsoft Fabric to integrate data from several on-premises and cloud-based data sources. Following its acquisition of Acterys, Vena can now combine its Excel-native FP&A capabilities with Acterys’ proprietary Power BI write-back engine and unified analytics within Microsoft Fabric.
The platform provides comprehensive functionality for planning, budgeting, and forecasting and can be flexibly modeled to address business-model-specific use cases and requirements. The product supports both financial and operational planning (including sales, marketing, capex, workforce, cash flow, etc.) in one unified platform. Moreover, Vena and its partners offer preconfigured solutions for various use cases and industries. These solutions include templates, data models, connectors, and business logic and can be adapted to a customer’s specific needs. Based on the planning model, Vena leverages an Excel grid interface to create planning forms as well as plan data entry. To control planning processes, Vena offers a web-based, visual workflow designer and blueprint to help in the development of individual workflows (e.g., task management and due dates, status monitoring, approval, email notifications, etc.). Once plan data is entered, anomalies and potential data entry errors can be recognized using AI and ML capabilities. Customers can create advanced predictive ML forecast models, gain strategic insights, and detect unusual patterns in data. In addition, Vena Copilot’s agentic and generative AI capabilities, leveraging Microsoft Azure OpenAI, can help business users create forecasts, conduct what-if simulations, identify seasonal patterns, generate reports, analyze trends, and answer business questions in natural language. Vena Copilot dynamically manages a team of AI agents including Planning Agent, Analytics Agent, Reporting Agent, Query Agent, and others. The Vena Planning Agent is an AI-powered capability, designed to bring intelligent forecasting and scenario modeling directly into Vena’s Excel add-in.
Fully integrated with the platform’s core capabilities, Vena offers preconfigured solutions and templates for financial consolidation, financial close management, account reconciliation, lease accounting, and tax and ESG/sustainability accounting. Statutory as well as management consolidation processes are supported with prebuilt data models, connectors, and business logic, including accounting for partial ownership, intercompany eliminations, multiple currencies, and multiple ERPs/general ledgers.
For reporting and self-service analytics, Vena leverages an Excel grid interface connected to Vena CubeFLEXTM to explore data and create reports. Furthermore, for advanced dashboards with interactive data visualizations, mobile support, natural language capabilities, and generative insights, Vena embeds Microsoft Power BI (Vena Insights). Vena Copilot Reporting Agent and Analytics Agent can help with custom ad hoc scenario report generation through natural language conversations as well as variance and scenario trend analysis.
Strengths and challenges of Vena Platform
BARC’s viewpoint on the product’s strengths and challenges.
Strengths
- Cloud-based, flexible CPM platform designed for business users with unified functionality for planning, budgeting, forecasting, reporting, analytics, financial consolidation and close, and account reconciliation.
- Tight and strategic integration with Microsoft's technology stack (e.g., Office, Teams, Power BI, Azure, Fabric). Leverages the native Excel interface for ease of use, modeling, and to work with the platform. Advanced self-service analytics via embedded Power BI (Vena Insights) and Microsoft’s AI and ML technology (Vena Copilot).
- Flexibility for a wide variety of planning approaches (centralized top-down, decentralized bottom-up) and planning topics (including financial and operational planning) aimed at companies of all sizes and industries. Supplementary preconfigured but adaptable solutions and templates for specific industries and topics.
- Feedback in this year’s Planning Survey reveals a high level of customer satisfaction with the success and length of implementation projects, price to value, vendor and implementer support, ease of use, as well as with the product in general and its planning functionality. Vena is highly recommended by customers.
Challenges
- Vena relies heavily on the Microsoft technology stack and its tools and functionality. For instance, Microsoft Power BI is embedded in Vena's platform for advanced dashboarding. However, in our opinion, this poses a risk because technical changes to the technology stack by Microsoft could render Vena's functions invalid or impaired.
- Vena provides its own data integration options and open APIs, while Microsoft Fabric Data Factory can also be used for advanced integrations and data processing. Prebuilt connectors to selected source systems are available leveraging Microsoft Fabric. However, feedback from The Planning Survey 26 shows that neither Vena’s predefined data connectivity nor its data integration capabilities entirely satisfy customers.
- Vena lacks the market presence and global visibility of its main competitors. Most of the company’s business is still in North America and the UK. However, according to the vendor, its international customer count, partner ecosystem, and revenues are expanding (e.g., in EMEA). Prospects outside North America and the UK should evaluate the vendor’s and partners’ local consulting and support capabilities.
Vena Platform User Reviews & Experiences
The information contained in this section is based on user feedback and actual experience with Vena Platform.
The information and figures are largely drawn from BARC’s The BI & Analytics Survey, The Planning Survey, The Financial Consolidation Survey and The Data Management Survey. You can find out more about these surveys by clicking on the relevant links.
Summary of user review highlights from Vena Platform
What users like about Vena Platform and where the product scores best in a user comparison.
Who uses Vena Platform in a planning context and how
Why users buy Vena Platform and what problems they have using it
- Get independent information on software solutions, market developments and trends in data, analytics, business intelligence, data science and corporate performance management.
- Make data & analytics decisions based on numbers, data, facts and expert knowledge
- Access to all premium articles and all our research, including all software comparison studies, scores and surveys.
- Unlimited access to the BARC media library
- Consume unlimited content anywhere
Full user reviews and KPI results for Vena Platform
All key figures for Vena Platform at a glance.
- Get independent information on software solutions, market developments and trends in data, analytics, business intelligence, data science and corporate performance management.
- Make data & analytics decisions based on numbers, data, facts and expert knowledge
- Access to all premium articles and all our research, including all software comparison studies, scores and surveys.
- Unlimited access to the BARC media library
- Consume unlimited content anywhere
Individual user reviews for Vena Platform
Number of employees
Industry
Source
What do you like best?
Excel integration.
What do you like least/what could be improved?
Better connectivity to the ERP app.
What key advice would you give to other companies looking to introduce/use the product?
Make sure you have finance staff dedicated to the project with enough time for training and implementation.
How would you sum up your experience?
A good solution.
Number of employees
Industry
Source
What do you like best?
Flexibility, adaptation and user interaction.
What do you like least/what could be improved?
Hard to escalate; lack of capabilities for data processing.
What key advice would you give to other companies looking to introduce/use the product?
Have custom HC in-house.
How would you sum up your experience?
Good, quick, flexible, but a little short on resources for data.
Number of employees
Industry
Source
What do you like best?
What I like most about Vena is the time it saves once reporting and planning structures are built. Reports and templates are designed once and then reused and refreshed automatically, rather than constantly rebuilt or maintained in disconnected spreadsheets. Having a centralized data model and standardized templates has significantly reduced manual rework, version-control issues, and ongoing maintenance effort. This allows the team to spend far less time rebuilding reports and far more time analyzing results and supporting the business.
What do you like least/what could be improved?
While Vena is very flexible, building and maintaining more complex models and templates still requires a high level of platform expertise. Even with a sandbox environment available for testing, development and troubleshooting can be resource-intensive and create key-person dependency. Some configuration and calculation logic is not always intuitive, and changes can take time to design, test, and validate before moving to production. Improvements around ease of maintenance, clearer tooling for complex logic, and stronger version control and documentation would make the platform easier to scale and support over time.
What key advice would you give to other companies looking to introduce/use the product?
Invest time upfront in designing a strong data model and standardized templates before expanding functionality. Early decisions around dimensions, governance, and reporting structure have a long-term impact on scalability and ease of use, so it’s important to think beyond immediate requirements and design for future use. In practice, this often means building in more dimensionality than you think you need to avoid being constrained later. Focus just as much on user adoption, onboarding, and buy-in as on the technical build. Clear ownership, training, and early engagement with users are critical to driving consistent usage and realizing value from the system. Ensure you have dedicated internal ownership with both finance and systems expertise. Vena is powerful, but it is not a tool that can be implemented casually or part-time. Treat it as a true transformation project with a committed project team responsible for its long-term success.
How would you sum up your experience?
My overall opinion of Vena is extremely positive. It has become a core platform for how we plan, forecast, and report, and it has fundamentally changed the way our finance team operates. The combination of Excel familiarity with a centralized, governed data model makes it both powerful and practical. Once implemented, the efficiency gains are significant. Reporting and planning structures are built once and then reused, which dramatically reduces ongoing maintenance and manual rework. Vena has enabled better discipline, consistency, and confidence in our financial processes. At this point, Vena is not just a tool we use; it’s a system I would actively look for in future roles. The value it provides in terms of scalability, control, and long-term efficiency makes it a critical part of our finance ecosystem.
Number of employees
Industry
Source
What do you like best?
Excel front end, templates simple to use for budget holders, process workflow, one source of truth, manages our complicated staff-planning requirements.
What do you like least/what could be improved?
Sometimes it can be slow to load; better experience needed for Mac users.
What key advice would you give to other companies looking to introduce/use the product?
–
How would you sum up your experience?
Happy with the product and support we receive.
Number of employees
Industry
Source
What do you like best?
Excel front‑end is familiar to users and allows great flexibility in the design of reports and input templates. Combining the latest Excel functionality (which is improving all the time as Microsoft invests in Excel) with the robustness and security of saving data in a database is incredibly powerful. Ability to easily perform calculations and data transformations directly on the database. Ease of adding new data sources. Ability to automate almost everything.
What do you like least/what could be improved?
–
What key advice would you give to other companies looking to introduce/use the product?
Be really clear about all your reporting requirements for financial and operational data up front, and ensure you build your data models and dimensions accordingly to support this.
How would you sum up your experience?
Great product and great company—big enough to be good at what they do, but small enough to care. Properly integrating Excel (and, increasingly, other parts of the Microsoft ecosystem) is a genius move, and customers benefit from both the investment that Vena put into their product and the investments that Microsoft make in theirs.
Number of employees
Industry
Source
What do you like best?
Flexibility to adapt planning templates, drivers, etc., as the business evolves.
What do you like least/what could be improved?
Reporting / dashboarding.
What key advice would you give to other companies looking to introduce/use the product?
Be clear on the problems you want to solve, and recognise that Vena is an Excel‑centric planning tool rather than a full BI platform.
How would you sum up your experience?
Vena is a very strong, reliable planning and forecasting platform that works particularly well for organisations heavily invested in Excel. It provides strong control, auditability, and structure around financial planning processes.
Number of employees
Industry
Source
What do you like best?
Vena’s biggest strength is that it uses Excel as the core modelling interface. This allows finance teams to build and maintain models using existing skills, enabling flexibility while still providing governance, workflow and control.
What do you like least/what could be improved?
Data and master data governance are not native strengths, so success depends heavily on having clear upstream data definitions and ownership. Model performance and maintainability also rely on good design discipline.
What key advice would you give to other companies looking to introduce/use the product?
Put data governance in place first, keep models simple, assign clear long-term ownership, and treat Vena as an ongoing product rather than a one-off implementation.
How would you sum up your experience?
Vena is a strong, finance‑led CPM platform when implemented well. Its value comes from combining Excel flexibility with structured governance.
Number of employees
Industry
Source
What do you like best?
Die sehr starke Integration in die Excel‑Umgebung, die uns den Sprung von Excel zu Vena sehr vereinfacht hat.
What do you like least/what could be improved?
Die Useroberfläche könnte etwas moderner sein.
What key advice would you give to other companies looking to introduce/use the product?
Die Planungsmethode genau zu analysieren und dann in Vena zu integrieren.
How would you sum up your experience?
Es war sehr einfach und zu weiten Teilen selbsterklärend.
Number of employees
Industry
Source
What do you like best?
Flexibility and ease of use.
What do you like least/what could be improved?
Handling our large dataset — slowness.
What key advice would you give to other companies looking to introduce/use the product?
Do a PoC.
How would you sum up your experience?
Great flexible system.
Number of employees
Industry
Source
What do you like best?
Consolidated data can easily be displayed in reports, especially if certain data in the reports have been updated.
What do you like least/what could be improved?
Document needs to be checked out (downloaded) and checked in (uploaded) once adaptations have been made.
What key advice would you give to other companies looking to introduce/use the product?
Determine what the needs are to be able to maximize the functionalities of Vena.
How would you sum up your experience?
Good budgeting tool but pricey if there is no discount applied to the annual fee.
Number of employees
Industry
Source
What do you like best?
Full access for developing in‑house customization to backend and frontend.
What do you like least/what could be improved?
The Mac integration is not convenient; Mac users hate it. Missing some AI forecasting (basically the machine going through the data and preplan/preforecast itself).
What key advice would you give to other companies looking to introduce/use the product?
Clean up data beforehand.
How would you sum up your experience?
I love that I can modify the platform as per my requirements and with an Excel front end; however, Excel is also limiting Vena in the long run due to its missing graphical capabilities — Excel will always look like Excel.
Number of employees
Industry
Source
What do you like best?
The ease of use. The visibility of data for the operations and business leaders.
What do you like least/what could be improved?
–
What key advice would you give to other companies looking to introduce/use the product?
Be clear on what you want but be open to the vendor and implementers suggestions. Also, make sure your metadata is in a good shape prior to starting implementation.
How would you sum up your experience?
I really like Vena Solutions.
Number of employees
Industry
Source
What do you like best?
It looks like Excel. But it works better because of everything around it.
What do you like least/what could be improved?
The Export API is still the beta version and not fully ready. It took a lot of effort from our BI team to make it happen.
What key advice would you give to other companies looking to introduce/use the product?
Make sure you prepare all datasets and harmonize your meta data beforehand. If that is not feasible make at least a plan how to cope with it in a structured manner. You need to approach this as a project and take ownership. Find good consultants to aid you.
How would you sum up your experience?
Very intuitive and improving to be a webbased tool as well. Interesting to see how it will grow along with all companies needs.
Number of employees
Industry
Source
What do you like best?
The flexibility of the software allows you to create as many tasks, templates, and reports as needed. The options for automatic calculations are extensive, and the use of industry packages makes implementation easy.
What do you like least/what could be improved?
It takes some time to fully understand the way of making your own templates. The integration between two solutions (foundation and banking) is time consuming to update (update needs to be done twice).
What key advice would you give to other companies looking to introduce/use the product?
Follow the online training courses, take time for the implementation and build your own templates.
How would you sum up your experience?
We're very satisfied with the options Vena has.
Number of employees
Industry
Source
What do you like best?
The platform is built on Excel, making it very easy for my users to adopt since they were already familiar with Excel. We also have a good relationship with the Vena staff we interact with, which makes a huge difference.
What do you like least/what could be improved?
Some users have complained that Excel opens slightly slower since they started using the Vena add-in. However, this may be due to limited memory on their laptops.
What key advice would you give to other companies looking to introduce/use the product?
Have a dedicated power user or subject matter expert (SME) working full-time on the project. I was the dedicated power user for my company during implementation, and we know the project was successful because I was able to allocate 100% of my time to it.
How would you sum up your experience?
Very good.
Number of employees
Industry
Source
What do you like best?
It utilizes Excel, which is familiar to everyone.
What do you like least/what could be improved?
Integration with our core.
What key advice would you give to other companies looking to introduce/use the product?
Take time and plan out your road map.
How would you sum up your experience?
Very good software.
Number of employees
Industry
Source
What do you like best?
User-friendliness.
What do you like least/what could be improved?
This is a small detail, but input forms inserted in tasks cannot be displayed in a predefined sorting order. Therefore, the order of the forms is not always logical. We solved this by adding numbers to the form titles to help contributors follow the input forms in sequential order.
What key advice would you give to other companies looking to introduce/use the product?
Just do it! Start with the basics and gradually implement more complexity along the way.
How would you sum up your experience?
Extremely user-friendly and flexible tool that allows you to build in complexity along the way.
Number of employees
Industry
Source
What do you like best?
I like the automatic analysis and the PowerPoint-Vena real-time reporting we can do to show management accounts.
What do you like least/what could be improved?
The time it takes to open files in Vena can be quite time consuming.
What key advice would you give to other companies looking to introduce/use the product?
Take the time to design and plan templates to ensure all the information we need is implemented in line with expectations.
How would you sum up your experience?
I do like Vena, and can see the benefits for consolidating the accounts, and showing the analysis on a real time basis.
Number of employees
Industry
Source
What do you like best?
I really admire Vena Solutions for its intuitive platform that seamlessly integrates with Excel, making it easy for businesses to streamline financial planning and analysis. Its collaborative approach to budgeting and forecasting stands out, along with excellent customer support that ensures success for its users.
What do you like least/what could be improved?
While Vena Solutions is powerful, its initial setup can feel complex and time-intensive for some users. Improvements in onboarding and more streamlined customization options could enhance the overall experience and reduce the learning curve.
What key advice would you give to other companies looking to introduce/use the product?
Implementing Vena Solutions can significantly enhance your financial planning and analysis processes. To ensure a successful implementation, consider the following best practices: Define Clear Objectives: Identify your specific goals and requirements to tailor Vena to your organization's needs. Engage Key Stakeholders Early: Involve finance, IT, and other relevant departments from the outset to ensure alignment and support. Start with a Focused Scope: Begin with a single use case or department to demonstrate value quickly and build momentum for broader adoption. Invest in Training: Provide comprehensive training for users to maximize the platform's capabilities and encourage user adoption. Leverage Expert Support: Consider partnering with experienced consultants to guide the implementation and share industry-specific best practices. By following these steps, you can effectively integrate Vena Solutions into your operations and achieve long-term success.
How would you sum up your experience?
Vena Solutions is a robust financial planning and analysis platform that integrates seamlessly with Microsoft Excel, offering a familiar interface for users. It excels in automating budgeting, forecasting, and reporting processes, leading to significant time savings and enhanced data accuracy. Users have praised its powerful data management capabilities and real-time collaboration features, which streamline financial operations and support informed decision-making. However, some users have noted that the initial implementation can be complex and time-consuming, with a steep learning curve for mastering all functionalities. Additionally, the platform's reliance on Excel may limit scalability for larger organizations with more complex needs. Overall, Vena Solutions is well-suited for medium to large-sized organizations seeking to enhance their financial processes through automation and improved collaboration.
Number of employees
Industry
Source
What do you like best?
The Excel-based platform provided ease of use compared to other applications, along with flexibility, integration capabilities, and strengths in reporting.
What do you like least/what could be improved?
It takes some time for a new user to get a handle on, and an integrator is definitely needed to get things set up.
What key advice would you give to other companies looking to introduce/use the product?
Plan your implementation well in advance, four to eight months, to be certain you will not have issues during implementation.
How would you sum up your experience?
Very strong, well-built software, perfectly geared for budgeting and forecasting.
Number of employees
Industry
Source
What do you like best?
Flexibility to manipulate existing data, as well as easily create ways for users to upload new types of data. Being able to drill down into data is useful, especially the drill-save feature that shows how a given value has changed over time, along with a copy of the exact file state that led to that value.
What do you like least/what could be improved?
Genuinely no obvious issues - there isn't anything I have requested so far that our Vena consultant (Margaret) couldn't find a solution for.
What key advice would you give to other companies looking to introduce/use the product?
Involve several people in building reports rather than just one or two. I feel it's harder to learn how to build your own reports when all the main reports are already built.
How would you sum up your experience?
A big improvement over the last system — the ability to fully manipulate and drill into data is appreciated, and most of all, being able to access all files that led to data changes.
Number of employees
Industry
Source
What do you like best?
Adaptability.
What do you like least/what could be improved?
User experience/interface: Poor Mac support and lots of minor bugs/errors for users.
What key advice would you give to other companies looking to introduce/use the product?
You will always need forecast champions.
How would you sum up your experience?
Great tool.
Number of employees
Industry
Source
What do you like best?
True integration with Excel.
What do you like least/what could be improved?
Not much.
What key advice would you give to other companies looking to introduce/use the product?
Work with an implementation partner to get the most.
How would you sum up your experience?
Great software. It saves my team time so we can focus on the real tasks of FP&A.
Number of employees
Industry
Source
What do you like best?
Stability, fast load times, and perfect MS Excel integration.
What do you like least/what could be improved?
Unfortulatelly there is no consolidation solution directly in Vena.
What key advice would you give to other companies looking to introduce/use the product?
Investigate how the interface with the consolidation tool works.
How would you sum up your experience?
Very nice tool.
Number of employees
Industry
Source
What do you like best?
Flexibility, easy to implement and multimodel software.
What do you like least/what could be improved?
Bad performance with big amounts of data. Also lack of certain data integration operations.
What key advice would you give to other companies looking to introduce/use the product?
Have an internal resource for managing, maintaining, and helping implement it.
How would you sum up your experience?
Good software for medium-small companies, with strong and modern integrations for larger companies. It retains the old mindset of Excel usage.
Number of employees
Industry
Source
What do you like best?
Excel-based interface.
What do you like least/what could be improved?
Lags when handling large volumes of data, data lost / unsaved when more then two people using it.
What key advice would you give to other companies looking to introduce/use the product?
Understand how data flows in and out of the system to avoid disruptions and provide ongoing training.
How would you sum up your experience?
Good.
Number of employees
Industry
Source
What do you like best?
It's flexible, once you know how to use it. It's a powerful tool that provides valuable insights. It's easy to use once reports are built and can be shared with other Vena users. The EMS team is extremely helpful.
What do you like least/what could be improved?
The workforce template is slow, it can be painful, work is underway to improve this. With out the EMS team we would not have carried on using it, but they are fantastic at helping us with reports.
What key advice would you give to other companies looking to introduce/use the product?
Pay for the EMS support, invest in it from the beginning to give yourself the best chance. And test reports!
How would you sum up your experience?
Really good FP&A system. Exciting to be part of Vena's growth.
Number of employees
Industry
Source
What do you like best?
Great solution that is easy to use and does what you need it to.
What do you like least/what could be improved?
Nothing, no issues with it at all.
What key advice would you give to other companies looking to introduce/use the product?
Good solution, relatively fast to deploy. Don't spend too long making it complicated. Use it and then add to it.
How would you sum up your experience?
Great solution.
Number of employees
Industry
Source
What do you like best?
User-friendly, with an Excel look and feel, and easy to use for both business owners and power users.
What do you like least/what could be improved?
Integration with data warehouses and other tools.
What key advice would you give to other companies looking to introduce/use the product?
Start small, dream big.
How would you sum up your experience?
Good.




